Nepal’s Political Crisis Deepens
Kathmandu, September 10: Nepal is once again in the grip of political turmoil after weeks of protests forced Prime Minister KP Sharma Oli to resign. What started as anger over the government’s controversial social media bans has evolved into a mass uprising against Nepal’s political establishment.
The protests, described as a “Gen Z movement,” highlight frustration among young Nepalis who feel betrayed by democratic parties. Demonstrators accuse leaders of corruption, inequality, and lavish lifestyles while ignoring the country’s economic and employment crises.
As the anger intensifies, many are asking whether former King Gyanendra Shah could play a role in shaping Nepal’s future. Calls for restoring the monarchy, once considered fringe, are gaining strength.
From Discontent to Radical Action
The resignation of Oli has done little to calm tensions. Protesters have taken to the streets with unprecedented fury, targeting the homes of top politicians, including Pushpa Kamal Dahal, leader of the Communist Party of Nepal (Maoist Centre).
The Supreme Court building was set on fire, a dramatic act that reflected deep frustration with the judiciary and the political system. The protests, unlike those in neighboring Bangladesh, are not aligned with any single opposition party. Instead, the public rage is directed at both ruling and opposition figures, suggesting anger with the entire political class rather than individuals.
This broad-based revolt signals a systemic failure. For many Nepalis, the promises made in 2008 after the end of the monarchy have gone unfulfilled.
A Troubled Transition to Democracy
Nepal’s transition from a Hindu monarchy to a secular republic was supposed to mark a new era of stability and growth. Instead, the years since 2008 have been defined by fragile coalitions, corruption scandals, and rotating governments.
The country has seen over a dozen prime ministers in 17 years, with power shifting between the same political elites. The absence of long-term governance has stalled development and fueled public disillusionment.
In this context, the idea of restoring the monarchy has resurfaced. While critics dismiss it as regressive, supporters argue that Nepal needs a unifying figure to stabilize politics.
Gyanendra Shah: A Symbol for Some
Nearly two decades after his ouster, Gyanendra Shah remains a figure of interest. Though his reign ended amid accusations of authoritarianism, a segment of the population views him as a potential savior from endless political chaos.
Royalist groups argue that Gyanendra could bring stability and national identity at a time when the republic has failed to deliver. Supporters point to his symbolic value rather than his policies, portraying him as a neutral leader above partisan disputes.
Although the former king has remained relatively quiet, his presence at public events and religious gatherings continues to draw attention. Analysts suggest that even if he does not actively seek power, the growing royalist sentiment could pressure mainstream politics.
What Lies Ahead for Nepal?
The current protests have left Nepal at a crossroads. On one side lies the possibility of reform within the existing republican system. On the other lies the growing push for a return to monarchy or an alternative political structure altogether.
For now, Gyanendra Shah’s role remains speculative. He has not announced any political intentions, but the rising calls for his return reflect deep disappointment with democracy’s failures.
Nepal’s youth, once hopeful about the republic, are demanding genuine change. Whether that change comes through political reform, new leadership, or even the monarchy’s revival will shape the country’s future.