Isudan Gadhvi has strongly criticized the state administration over a demolition drive in Jamnagar involving an elderly Ahir couple, alleging that the action reflects insensitivity towards poor and vulnerable families.
Isudan Gadhvi Slams Gujarat Government Over Alleged Governance Gap and Unjust Eviction Process
He said the issue highlights a growing gap in governance where, according to him, the needs of common citizens are being ignored while development priorities favor influential groups. Isudan Gadhvi Slams Gujarat Government over what he described as a harsh and unjust eviction process carried out without adequate rehabilitation arrangements.
Also read : AAP Launches Statewide Protests in Gujarat Over NEET Paper Leak, Demands Justice for 23 Lakh Students
Gadhvi alleged that the elderly couple, who had been residing at the location for years, were displaced without proper alternative housing. Reiterating his criticism, Isudan Gadhvi Slams Gujarat Government for what he called a failure to ensure basic shelter rights for the poor.
Humanitarian Concerns Raised Over Demolition and Lack of Rehabilitation in Gujarat
જામનગરના જડેશ્વર પાર્ક પાસે આવેલી વસાહતમાં આજે સરકારી તંત્ર દ્વારા ડિમોલિશનની કામગીરી હાથ ધરવામાં આવી. વર્ષોથી રહેતા ગરીબ પરિવારોના કાચા-પાકા મકાનો કોઈ વૈકલ્પિક વ્યવસ્થા આપ્યા વગર ક્ષણભરમાં પાડી દેવામાં આવ્યા.
એક તરફ કાળઝાળ ગરમી છે અને બીજી તરફ આ પરિવારો માટે કોઈ વૈકલ્પિક… pic.twitter.com/feyReg08k9
— AAP Gujarat (@AAPGujarat) May 14, 2026
He further claimed that such actions raise serious humanitarian concerns, especially when vulnerable citizens are affected during extreme weather conditions. Once again, Isudan Gadhvi Slams Gujarat Government for not prioritizing rehabilitation before demolition activities.
The AAP leader also questioned the broader policy direction, stating that land allocation practices appear uneven, with industrial interests receiving preference over housing needs of the poor. According to him, Isudan Gadhvi Slams Gujarat Government reflects wider concerns about governance and public welfare priorities.
He urged that eviction or demolition actions should always include proper alternative arrangements, warning that ignoring this could lead to further public distress.