Punjab: In a strong response to recent remarks made by Congress leader Pratap Singh Bajwa, Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) Punjab spokesperson and MLA Kuldeep Singh Dhaliwal statement highlighted Bajwa’s lack of understanding about Sangrur’s historical significance. The statement, shared on AAP Punjab’s official X page, has sparked political discussions across the state.
AAP Leader Criticizes Pratap Bajwa
According to the Kuldeep Singh Dhaliwal statement, Bajwa should have read about Sangrur’s rich history before making controversial comments. Dhaliwal said, “Sangrur is the land that gave birth to great movements and revolutionary warriors. Bajwa should feel ashamed for making objectionable remarks about the region.”
Also read : Shri Sant Guru Nabh Das Ji Birth Anniversary: Bhagwant Mann Shares Heartfelt Wishes
Political Implications
The Kuldeep Singh Dhaliwal statement comes at a time when political sensitivities around Punjab’s history and heritage are high. By emphasizing the importance of understanding Sangrur’s legacy, Dhaliwal aimed to protect the pride of local communities and hold political leaders accountable for their statements.
‘ਆਪ’ ਪੰਜਾਬ ਦੇ ਮੁੱਖ ਬੁਲਾਰੇ ਤੇ ਵਿਧਾਇਕ @KuldeepSinghAAP ਨੇ ਘਟੀਆ ਬਿਆਨਬਾਜ਼ੀ ਲਈ ਘੇਰਿਆ ਪ੍ਰਤਾਪ ਬਾਜਵਾ !!
ਕਿਹਾ, ਸੰਗਰੂਰ ਬਾਰੇ ਬੋਲਣ ਤੋਂ ਪਹਿਲਾਂ ਪ੍ਰਤਾਪ ਸਿੰਘ ਬਾਜਵਾ ਪਹਿਲਾਂ ਉੱਥੇ ਦਾ ਇਤਿਹਾਸ ਪੜ੍ਹ ਲੈਂਦਾ। ਸੰਗਰੂਰ ਉਹ ਧਰਤੀ ਹੈ, ਜਿਸ ਨੇ ਵੱਡੀਆਂ-ਵੱਡੀਆਂ ਲਹਿਰਾਂ ਤੇ ਇਨਕਲਾਬੀ ਯੋਧੇ ਪੈਦਾ ਕੀਤੇ ਹਨ। ਸੰਗਰੂਰ ਦੀ ਧਰਤੀ ਬਾਰੇ… pic.twitter.com/I4WqrVM5wm
— AAP Punjab (@AAPPunjab) April 8, 2026
Social Media Reaction
The Kuldeep Singh Dhaliwal statement was shared widely on social media, with AAP supporters praising the MLA for defending Sangrur’s history. The post underscores the party’s commitment to upholding regional pride and historical awareness in political discourse.
Through the Kuldeep Singh Dhaliwal statement, AAP has sent a clear message to political rivals about respecting Punjab’s heritage. The statement reinforces the importance of historical knowledge and sensitivity when discussing regions like Sangrur, reminding leaders of their responsibility towards public discourse.