The Arvind Kejriwal affidavit recusal case has gained fresh momentum after former Delhi chief minister Arvind Kejriwal filed an additional affidavit before the Delhi High Court, reiterating his demand for the recusal of Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma in the CBI’s appeal linked to the excise policy case.
Arvind Kejriwal Affidavit Recusal Case Raises Conflict of Interest Allegations
In the latest development, the Arvind Kejriwal affidavit recusal case highlights allegations of a potential conflict of interest. Kejriwal has argued that the judge’s children are empanelled with the Centre and receive case assignments through Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, who is appearing for the CBI in the matter.
The affidavit claims that this institutional linkage creates a “serious apprehension of bias,” which forms the central argument of the Arvind Kejriwal affidavit recusal case.
Detailed Claims in the Affidavit
The Arvind Kejriwal affidavit recusal case further states that Justice Sharma’s son and daughter are actively engaged in government-related legal work, including multiple cases assigned over the past few years.
Kejriwal also alleged procedural concerns during court hearings, including restrictions on submissions and continuation of proceedings while the recusal application was still pending consideration.
Read More : TCS Nashik Case Update: Witness Alleges Targeted Conversion Plot in Harassment Scandal by Muslim Colleagues
Background of the CBI Appeal
The Arvind Kejriwal affidavit recusal case is connected to the CBI’s challenge against the discharge of Kejriwal, former deputy chief minister Manish Sisodia, and other accused in the excise policy case.
Earlier, the trial court had discharged the accused, stating that there was no prima facie evidence. However, the CBI contested this decision in the High Court, leading to the ongoing legal battle.
Court Proceedings So Far
The Arvind Kejriwal affidavit recusal case follows multiple hearings where arguments from both sides were presented. The bench has already reserved its order on the recusal applications after an extensive hearing session.
Previously, a plea to transfer the matter to another bench was also rejected, keeping the case under the same court.
The Arvind Kejriwal affidavit recusal case remains a crucial legal development in the ongoing excise policy dispute. The Delhi High Court’s upcoming decision on the recusal plea is expected to play a key role in shaping the next phase of the proceedings.