The Punjab and Haryana High Court has denied regular bail to an ex-serviceman accused of contacting foreign espionage agencies. Investigators discovered that he shared confidential details on troop movements in exchange for monetary payouts.
Presiding over the case, Justice Manisha Batra observed that the petitioner maintained continuous communication with foreign handlers. Consequently, the bench emphasized that national security concerns outweigh personal liberty in cases involving alleged espionage.
The court noted that the allegations involve severe compromises to national integrity. Therefore, granting bail at this stage would run counter to public interest.
Intelligence Unit Uncovers Espionage Network
The case originated from specific intelligence received by the State Special Operation Cell in Amritsar. Authorities received a secret tip regarding an ex-serviceman posted with the Defence Service Corps at Bikaner Air Force Station.
According to the prosecution, the accused used social media networks to build rapport with foreign operatives. Moreover, he allegedly exploited his former military network to gather classified intelligence.
His contacts provided sensitive data regarding active troop deployments, war readiness, and military formations. Furthermore, state authorities alleged that the petitioner received direct digital funds for these disclosures.
On the day of his arrest, investigators assigned him to monitor troop movements near Amritsar Cantonment. Officers acted swiftly on the intelligence and took him into custody.
Also Read : Tamil Nadu Assembly Rejects FCRA Amendment Bill 2026: House Demands Withdrawal
Defence Claims False Implication and Service Record
Defending the accused, counsel argued that the petitioner served seventeen years in the military with an unblemished record. Additionally, the defence maintained that officers picked him up unlawfully from a family social gathering.
The legal team asserted that charges in the FIR remain vague and lack solid digital proof. Furthermore, they claimed no confidential documents were physically recovered from his possession.
Addressing money transfers, the defence stated that a small payment of three thousand rupees came from a personal acquaintance. Therefore, they argued that connecting this transaction to a foreign handler was entirely unfounded.
Since the investigation is complete and the final charge sheet is filed, the defence urged for release. However, the prosecution strongly opposed this plea due to the severe risks involved.
High Court Prioritizes National Security Over Liberty
State prosecutors emphasized that the accused was in constant touch with foreign intelligence operatives over the phone. Consequently, releasing the suspect could endanger ongoing investigations and national stability.
Justice Manisha Batra highlighted the critical nature of the investigative material collected so far. The court observed that the petitioner established contacts across social media platforms to transmit defense data.
Given these facts, the court ruled that an ex-Army man denied bail must remain in custody during trial. Nevertheless, the bench clarified that these observations will not prejudice the independent trial proceedings.