Ranveer Singh’s film Dhurandhar: The Revenge is performing exceptionally well at the box office, earning praise for his powerful acting. Meanwhile, the actor is also facing legal proceedings related to the Ranveer Singh Kantara mimicry controversy in the Karnataka High Court.
Court Hearing and Apology Plans
During the recent hearing, the complainant’s lawyer raised objections, stating that Ranveer Singh had not apologized sincerely for the Kantara mimicry controversy. The next hearing has been scheduled for April 10, 2026.
Ranveer Singh will submit an affidavit in court on April 10, offering an unconditional apology. His legal team has also proposed that the actor is willing to visit the Chamundi temple in Mysuru to apologize in person, emphasizing the sincerity of his remorse.
Also read : Sitaare Zameen Par OTT Release Confirmed: Aamir Khan Film to Stream on SonyLIV from April 3
However, the complainant’s lawyer, Prashant Methal, questioned the sincerity of the apology, pointing out that Ranveer Singh had only apologized on Instagram and not face-to-face. The court acknowledged both sides and deferred the next hearing until April 10.
Background of the Ranveer Singh Kantara Mimicry Controversy
The Ranveer Singh Kantara mimicry controversy began last year during the closing ceremony of the International Film Festival of India 2025 in Goa. Ranveer Singh performed a mimicry of Rishab Shetty’s character from Kantara: Chapter 1, which sparked criticism.
During his performance, Ranveer Singh referred to the Chamundi deity as a female ghost while imitating Rishab Shetty, which offended some viewers and led to widespread backlash. The actor later shared a social media post clarifying that his intent was only to showcase Rishab Shetty’s performance and not to hurt anyone’s sentiments.
With the court hearing set for April 10, 2026, Ranveer Singh is expected to offer both a formal and personal apology to resolve the Kantara mimicry controversy. The case highlights the sensitivity around public performances and mimicry, even when intended in jest, and emphasizes the importance of accountability by public figures.