The Punjab and Haryana High Court has dismissed a public interest litigation (PIL) challenging the upcoming film Emergency after receiving assurances from Additional Solicitor-General Satya Pal Jain. The PIL, filed by Gurinder Singh and another petitioner, claimed the film contained scenes that could offend the Sikh community. The petitioners sought a ban on the film’s release and requested the removal of the allegedly offensive scenes, as well as a review by a special panel including prominent Sikh figures.
During the court proceedings, Jain informed the bench that the film had not yet undergone the certification process under Rule 23 of the Cinematograph (Certification) Rules, 1983. He assured that the film would be evaluated in accordance with the Cinematograph Act, 1952, and the Rules of 1983, which include considerations for national sovereignty, state security, public order, and community sentiment.
Jain also emphasized that the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) would ensure the film adheres to the guidelines outlined in the December 6, 1991 notification, which aims to protect community sentiments.
Chief Justice Sheel Nagu and Justice Anil Kshetarpal noted that even after the film’s certification, any party dissatisfied with the decision could appeal to the CBFC’s revising committee under Rule 24 of the Cinematograph (Certification) Rules, 1983.
Given these assurances and the availability of alternative remedies, the court decided not to issue a notice in the case. The order concluded that the petitioners could pursue their concerns through the established remedies under the Cinematograph Act and Rules. The court expressed confidence that the assurances provided by Jain would be fulfilled and accordingly disposed of the petition.
